Talk:The Hitcher (2007 film)

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 January 2022 and 10 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Aed94 (article contribs).

Unreadable

I find the content on this article unreadable because of the terrible grammar (Mostly punctuation, but also spelling). Someone with knowledge of this film, please administer some heavy editing to the article. JuanD t (talk) 14:49, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Agreed. The plot description must have been written by a backward child. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.197.15.138 (talk) 04:46, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

TOC

I took out the trivia entry about this film being closer to the sequel than the original film. Besides the fact there there are two teenagers instead of one, the plot if much more similar to the original.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.110.197.20 (talk • contribs)

Unrated

Is there a reason the "unrated" version was scrapped? It was listed on amazon a few weeks ago, proclaiming to be 6 minutes longer, and now has been scrapped. McDanger 12:39, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

UK release date

To be released Monday 1st June?!... 1st June aint a Monday, and i dont know the actual release date to change it. Postmoderner 16:45, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Language

Is it even necessary to use the f-word in the plot section? -WarthogDemon 03:22, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Ending

The last paragraph of the plot describes the same ending sequence as mentioned in the alternate ending DVD. I dont know what the actually ending is, as Ive only seen the scene mentioned, so if somebody could add the cinema ending... 150.212.51.135 02:19, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:The Hitcher (2007) Poster.jpg

Image:The Hitcher (2007) Poster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 08:22, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Missing Information

This article is too short and underdeveloped and is missing a significant portion of information on the film's production, and reception which needs to be added to the article. Information on the film's development, writing, and filming needs to be added to the production section. More reviews from notable critics needs to be added to the article as well. All of these additions needs to occur in order for this article to meet Wikipiedia's standards of a well developed article.--Paleface Jack (talk) 00:33, 13 November 2015 (UTC)