Talk:The Habit of Fire

The Habit of Fire was a Music good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 12, 2011	Good article nominee	Not listed

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Indonesia Low‑importance

	Indonesia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Industrial Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Industrial, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Industrial music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndustrialWikipedia:WikiProject IndustrialTemplate:WikiProject IndustrialIndustrial music articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Industrial To-do:

Top priority articles to improve to Good article status

Front 242
Front Line Assembly
Ministry
Skinny Puppy
Throbbing Gristle – needs "Musical style" and "Critical reception" sections
Wax Trax! Records

High priority articles to improve to B-Class status

Mid priority articles to improve to C-Class status

Metal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal articles

GA fail edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Okay, here is list of what the GA review found:

1. It is reasonably well written. a (prose): Neutral b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): Neutral Prose could use some tweaking. Also, quoted information should be inside quotes. No external links on the lead. -[Will do]

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): Fail b (citations to reliable sources): Don't Know c (OR): Pass I'm unsure about forum usage. Maybe some other source? -[Which ref? If UltimateMetal interview, the band has officially approved it. on Facebook] Also, Band line-up needs verification. -[Done]

3. It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): Fail b (focused): Neutral Nothing mentioned about critical reception, charts etc. -[No chart info, I will expand critical reception and the like]

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: Pass I don't see any biased stuff. -[Yay!]

5. It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: Pass No edit-wars or stuffs. -[Yay!]

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): Neutral b (appropriate use with suitable captions): Neutral The album art could use a better rationale. -[Done]

7. Overall: Pass/Fail: Fail Sorry. You have to work more. See Breakout (album) or Ray of Light or Reign in Blood for an example. --3family6 (talk) 14:38, 12 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic