Talk:The Folklore Society

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Folklore Society article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Folklore High‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Folklore, a WikiProject dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of the topics of folklore and folklore studies. If you would like to participate, you may edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project's page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to discussion.FolkloreWikipedia:WikiProject FolkloreTemplate:WikiProject FolkloreFolklore articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Stub edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Can someone mark this as a stub? I stuck it up because at least two different versions of the name were already in use. Ffetcher 07:32, 8 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Article title edit

Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I suggest that the inclusion of the definite article (i.e. "The") violates Wikipedia:Naming conventions (definite or indefinite article at beginning of name). Should the 2012 move be reverted? Schwede 66 09:46, 18 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic