Talk:The Flaming Lips and Heady Fwends

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Robvanvee in topic Chronology in infobox

Potential source list edit

This is probably pedantic, but since several of the tracks were previously released, there is probably a little bit of material about the EPs that is relevant here as well... —Justin (koavf)TCM 20:28, 29 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

HOTT MT edit

About Hour of the Time Majesty 12 being credited on 2012, the CD, digital, and blood vinyl releases all have them listed next to Ke$ha and Biz Markie. Only the original vinyl release didn't, and that's probably just because there wasn't enough room on the tracklisting sticker. They helped write and play on the song and should be credited on here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.168.211.0 (talk) 22:49, 1 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Track listing template edit

It's a perfectly acceptable edit, you reason are not valid. If it's not supposed to be used why is it there? Why not get rid of it then. Also saying "I was here first" is not valid, you can't claim ownership of an article and dictate what it can look like.108.240.14.133 (talk) 23:03, 26 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Templates Since the template isn't required then whatever was done by the first major contributor stays, just like with WP:ENGVAR. Constantly reverting to add it back and doing nothing to otherwise enhance the article constitutes edit-warring. —Justin (koavf)TCM 06:40, 27 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Chronology in infobox edit

The next album in the infobox chronology after this one is the King Crimson covers album. But the link is just a redirect to the main article about the band since there is no article on the KC album. In any case I think the next album in the chronology should probably be the new one since the KC album is not a true Lips album. Any other views? --Viennese Waltz 09:21, 2 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

I was just thinking the same thing. It should redirect to The Terror which is their next studio album after The Flaming Lips and Heady Fwends. Lets give it 7 days and if there are no objections, I propose changing it. Robvanvee 15:55, 7 April 2013 (UTC)Reply