Talk:The Culinary Institute of America/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 15:24, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi! Will review this. Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 15:24, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Update: A bit busy now, I think I will be able to get to this only by the end of this week. Cheers! Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 18:47, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

That's fine, no rush. Thanks! ɱ (talk · vbm · coi) 19:08, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

@Ɱ: Managed to add all my comments, returning only for reviews! This article is so well-written, I have only a few comments: Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 07:23, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

• In History:

• sixteen students "sixteen" would look better in digits as per the MOS.

I like to keep history sections with more prose and less numbers if I can; and MOS:NUMERAL is okay with either. ɱ (talk · vbm · coi) 16:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Sure, your choice. Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 16:44, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

• "name was changed" is repeated at the end of the first para, how about "renamed"?

Done. ɱ (talk · vbm · coi) 16:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

• Also in 2015 Can be better worded as "The same year"

Done. ɱ (talk · vbm · coi) 16:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

• The college is opening a campus Better add "As of 2016".

Done. ɱ (talk · vbm · coi) 16:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

• purchased the northern portion of the property When?

This sentence is just more information about the same purchase, in 2015. ɱ (talk · vbm · coi) 16:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

• In Campus media:mise en place Does it not begin with caps?

That's correct, it's stylized in that fashion. ɱ (talk · vbm · coi) 16:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

• In The CIA Singapore: Temasek Polytechnic is a duplink

It's often seen as okay in certain circumstances. Here I link it in the history section, however many people just reading about the campuses (or not reading history/any large paragraphs) will surely miss that earlier link and presume there's no page on Temasek, if it lacks a link in that campus section, pretty far down the page too I might add. ɱ (talk · vbm · coi) 16:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

No problem. Duplinks are good in some cases... Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 16:44, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

• Parts of Campus media, Campuses, Brandig and Augie award need citations. Even if they do not need sources.

Looking into this... ɱ (talk · vbm · coi) 16:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

I added some sources already, but I have more to go... ɱ (talk · vbm · coi) 17:20, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

@Ɱ: I think you are busy elsewhere, when can we finish working on the last point? Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 13:48, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

I'm sorry. I did a bit more recently; I will get to it again tomorrow. ɱ (talk · vbm · coi) 01:18, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

No hurry, just let me know when you are done. The review is open till we keep working. :) Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 04:11, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Okay, I added a lot more references, what do you think now? ɱ (talk · vbm · coi) 17:23, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Much better! Only three parts look unsourced:

• The CIA Singapore section
• In popular media section
• Not all points on the alumni look sourced.

These fixed, I would be glad to promote this. Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 17:58, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Okay, it should be fixed now. By the way, I'm curious if you'll be willing to review my FAC Briarcliff Manor Public Library, perhaps in turn for me reviewing your FAC Springbok? I likely need more eyes on the library article in order for it to pass. ɱ (talk · vbm · coi) 23:45, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Great, I am happy to promote this article. Thanks for your kind offer, I am willing to review any nomination I have some idea about. Will take some time out for it. Try springbok of you get time, no quid pro quo necessary. Cheers, Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 03:43, 18 April 2016 (UTC)