Talk:The Book of Heroic Failures
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Fair use rationale for Image:The Book of Heroic Failiures.jpg edit
Image:The Book of Heroic Failiures.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:22, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
"The barges down in the river flop" edit
I have only read the sequel, so I can't vouch for this book. In its current form, Wikipedia's article does a good job of describing the book's release, but there's very little about the actual contents, other than that it is a "celebration of human inadequacy in all its forms". From what I remember, the sequel was a mixture of articles about newspaper clippings - usually involving incompetent bank robbers - and original descriptions of bad poets, failed operas etc. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 20:40, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, not true. I own both books and they both use the same format. They are both, incidentally, the funniest books I've ever read. - 210.80.189.226 (talk) 05:19, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
- The problem is that the current description doesn't make it clear whether the book is a novel, an autobiography, a list, a how-to guide, a compendium of paintings, or what. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 15:42, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- All of the above, except the compendium of paintings. - 122.106.12.222 (talk) 14:59, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
- The problem is that the current description doesn't make it clear whether the book is a novel, an autobiography, a list, a how-to guide, a compendium of paintings, or what. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 15:42, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
first edition is not heroic edit
I have a first edition of this book which I bought new. The title is "The (incomplete) book of failures" subtitle "the official handbook of the not-terribly-good club of Great Britain". The word "HEROIC" does not appear anywhere on the cover, which you can see a picture of at Amazon, here. --Charlie — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.153.180.229 (talk) 21:57, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
- After four years, the original anonymous poster has probably disappeared. Ah well. This is almost certainly the title of the USA edition. The way to check would be to look on the copyright page of the book where it will give its publication history. 74.205.219.217 (talk) 05:07, 10 July 2018 (UTC)