Talk:Thank God for Girls (album)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by SSTflyer in topic Requested move 29 June 2016

Requested move 29 June 2016 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved as proposed. SSTflyer 12:38, 15 July 2016 (UTC)Reply



Thank God for GirlsThank God for Girls (album)The Weezer song gets far more hits so obviously WP:PRIMARYTOPIC is not satisfied. Some could argue the song is a PRIMARYTOPIC in a twodabs scenario. I think it's too soon to judge, but in any case the album obviously shouldn't be undisambiguated. Nohomersryan (talk) 05:49, 29 June 2016 (UTC) --Relisting. Eventhorizon51 (talk) 14:27, 6 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

  • Oppose. Recentism. Let the dust settle. MelanieLamont (talk) 06:18, 29 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
    • How is this recentism? Maybe if I was proposing to make the Weezer tune PTOPIC, but I'm not. The album never had any significance, and it doesn't get any pageviews - after the song came out there was a large jump in its stats, a clear indication readers are being astonished. Nohomersryan (talk) 14:48, 29 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • Support. The recentism argument doesn't apply here, there is minimal reader interest in the obscure '70s album so it clearly can't be regarded as the primary topic. WP:TWODABS calls for a dab page if there is no clear primary topic. PC78 (talk) 23:09, 30 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • Support this move 2601:541:4305:C70:7D16:415F:39F:C598 (talk) 21:23, 6 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.