Talk:Thamizhaga Munnetra Munnani
 | A fact from Thamizhaga Munnetra Munnani appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 January 2009, and was viewed approximately 261 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dravidian party? edit
can this be classified as a dravidian party?. It was a splinter of Congress. Dont we define Dravidian parties as those who can trace their lineage back to Dravidar kazhagam?--Sodabottle (talk) 11:24, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
- Not exactly. But it would if you see that TMM was launched to fulfil Sivaji's political aspirations which wasn't brilliant when he was in Tamil National Party or later in Congress. After MGR's death he was keen on having his Tamil National Party back although Sampath and Kannadasan were dead by that time. If am right, at the time when TNP merged with Congress, EVR was on Kamaraj's side. However, I do not have any RS to back all this up. So if it doesn't look like a DP for others I don't have a problem of it being removed from the template. Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 14:48, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
- The 'Dravidian parties' category is quite problematic, there's no clear-cut demarkation between Dravidian and non-Dravidian parties. --Soman (talk) 15:05, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
- Aha...The TMM being the political successor to TNP angle makes sense. i didnt think of TNP earlier. For people like me, who grew up hearing of Sivaji as the Congress campaigner, he was just another congress faction leader. I just remember his "en pillaigalae" pitch :-). It does have Dravidian pedigree. To Soman: you are correct about the no clear cut demarcation for the later parties and splinters, but the older ones have clear claim to Dravidian Party tag. --Sodabottle (talk) 16:08, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
- The 'Dravidian parties' category is quite problematic, there's no clear-cut demarkation between Dravidian and non-Dravidian parties. --Soman (talk) 15:05, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Thamizhaga Munnetra Munnani. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090211021917/http://www.cscsarchive.org:80/dataarchive/textfiles/textfile.2007-09-19.6796899113/file to http://www.cscsarchive.org/dataarchive/textfiles/textfile.2007-09-19.6796899113/file
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:52, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Thamizhaga Munnetra Munnani. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl1816/18161140.htm - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081205041300/http://archive.sensesofcinema.com/contents/06/41/transnational-tamil-cinema.html to http://archive.sensesofcinema.com/contents/06/41/transnational-tamil-cinema.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080120043547/http://www.iniyan.in/familybackground.htm to http://iniyan.in/familybackground.htm
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cscsarchive.org/dataarchive/textfiles/textfile.2007-09-19.6796899113/file
- Added archive https://archive.is/20071114203713/http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl2115/stories/20040730003803600.htm to http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl2115/stories/20040730003803600.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:30, 9 September 2017 (UTC)