Talk:Tetley

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 14:44, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Current Human-Rights-Abuse scandal

I have added/moved information/citations from the recently-breaking human-rights-abuse issue: http://www.theguardian.com/global-development/video/2014/mar/01/tetley-tea-maids-real-price-cup-tea-video?CMP= http://web.law.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/microsites/human-rights-institute/files/tea_report_final_draft-smallpdf.pdf and changed some language that seemed to lacked NPOV: "it was claimed" in reference to the above reportage (out of Columbia Law School, The Human Rights Institute, & "The Guardian"); added source-cite for Columbia, and moved the Guardian source-cite to explicitly mark The Guardian as the source. Also, an un-sourced "the company has made clear" was changed to "the company has claimed". Taken together (the weak language on the claim-of-problem (particularly given the credibility & multiplicity of the sources), and the strong-assurance language that it's NOT a problem) it seemed to me that NPOV was not being upheld. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.130.70.182 (talk) 19:20, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

See Also

I don't think it makes sense to list this companies' competitors in the "See Also".. it gives the false impression that they have some sort of relationship with this company, which they don't. I see that this practice is repeated in some, but not all of the corresponding articles. I think Lipton, PG Tips, Brooke Bond and Typhoo should be removed from the "see also". Of course Tata Global and Tetley Tea People should remain. Any other opinions, or should I do this? Centerone (talk) 01:01, 8 February 2015 (UTC)