| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tenkasi Pandyas article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: withdrawn by nominator, closed by Yoninah (talk) 04:22, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
( )
- ... that after facing multiple invasions, the ancient Indian kingdom of Pandyas had to shift their capital from their traditional city of Madurai to Tenkasi? Source: With the invasion of the Sultanates, Vijayanagaras, and Nayakars from the fourteenth century onwards, the Pandyas lost their traditional capital of Madurai and lived in Tamil Nadu cities like Tenkasi and Tirunelveli. Karashima, Noburu. 2014. 'The Fall of the Old States', in A Concise History of South India: Issues and Interpretations, ed. Noburu Karashima, pp. 173–74. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
- ALT1:... that before their decline in the 16th century, Tenkasi was the last capital of the Pandya dynasty, one of the three monarchs of ancient south India? Source: The last capital of the Pandyas was Tenkasi. source
- ALT2:... that the Tamil monarchy of Pandyas lost their traditional capital in Madurai due to Madurai Sultanate invasions and had to move their base to Tenkasi? Karashima, Noburu. 2014. 'The Fall of the Old States', in A Concise History of South India: Issues and Interpretations, ed. Noburu Karashima, pp. 173–74. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Created by Shanze1 (talk). Self-nominated at 07:00, 10 April 2020 (UTC).
- This is just a comment rather than a review, but considering that the Pandya dynasty may be an unfamiliar term to most readers and perhaps to those not well-versed in Indian history, I would suggest adding additional context to the hook briefly explaining what it is, or even just mentioning that these events took place in India. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 09:46, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Narutolovehinata5: Thanks for the comment. I've made the additions you suggested. Do check and let me know if it looks fine. Shanze1 (talk) 15:24, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
- Those sound good now. I took a quick look at the article and for the most part it looks fine, but I'll leave the review to another editor as I admit that I have some difficulty reviewing this kind of article. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 22:37, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
Full review needed. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:49, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
New enough, long enough, neutrally written, well referenced. But I must admit I find it hard to follow the meaning of the article altogether. The sentence in the lead starting All the Pandyas from Sadaavarman Parakrama Pandya and his next generations were crowned in the Adheenam Mutt
seems to take the lead in a new direction. Sometimes you're talking about the Pandys people, and sometimes about the capital. The whole "Tenkasi's origin" section seems to belong in the article called Tenkasi. The Proofs section comes out of nowhere, and the Numismatics section lacks any citations, per Rule D2. I suggest you apply at WP:GOCE for someone to copyedit this article so it is more focused and flows logically. Yoninah (talk) 18:29, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
