Talk:Teju Cole

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

This article looks like an advertisement for the author and needs to be rewritten in a more unbiased way. 96.231.154.140 (talk) 21:26, 23 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Charlie Hebdo and PEN edit

The article previously described Cole as accusing Charlie Hebdo as being racist, based on a comparison with Rushdie. The original quote read "L’affaire Rushdie (for example) was a very different matter, as different as blasphemy is from racism." I think that the interpretation is reasonable, but as it is an interpretation, I'm uncomfortable with effectively going further than what was stated in the quote. Accordingly, I've removed the interpretation, but left in the quote, as that way the reader can come to their own understanding of what he meant. - Bilby (talk) 23:18, 28 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Controversies edit

Suggest renaming section - Cultural commentary. Cole is a cultural critic and provides commentary on many topics, including controversial ones. Although his views on Hebdo may be controversial to those who don't agree with them, writing an article about a controversial topic is not in and of itself a controversy. This section currently just provides links to articles that disagreed with Cole's position - the articles/videos themselves don't reference Cole or say that his opinion's were controversial. Such a sizeable controversies section relative to the rest of the article seems inappropriate, given the numerous ways Cole's work has been recognised, and his frequent cultural commentary in publications such as the New Yorker, NYT, Atlantic etc. The PEN award episode may be considered somewhat of a controversy, but again, just because Cole had a different opinion to other people on a controversial issue doesn't mean that Cole himself was controversial. Also the only person cited here as disagreeing with Cole and the other writer's position is Salman Rushdie, himself a highly controversial figure, who according to Cole's website said: "Teju Cole is among the most gifted writers of his generation”. A balanced article should probably include this too. (Cole and Rushdie also read shorts together in NYC in 2014.) Relative to the size of this controversy section the bibliography and awards sections seem relatively incomplete, for example missing a shortlisting for a PEN award, and there should definitely be mention in this article of Cole's Atlantic essay 'The White-Savior Industrial Complex' <ref>http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2012/03/the-white-savior-industrial-complex/254843/<ref> which has created much discussion, including a response from Nicholas Kristof and several articles. As I'm new to this article, I will leave this suggestion up for a few days to allow anybody who wishes to discuss it some time to do so before I make the change. Happy to say that his views have been controversial, if references are provided stating as such, but suggest it should remain under Cultural Commentary section heading or similar. —InternetArchiveBot (Report bug)

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Teju Cole. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:31, 5 May 2017 (UTC)Reply