Talk:Team classification in the Giro d'Italia

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cycling

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Dual winners edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

So General team classification was done both in time and points. Which was/is considered more prestigious? Why was that even done? To copy Tour de France? Sponsor conflict? Teams vs organiser conflict? Did they give the award to both, or did they split the award, or maybe give different awards?? If a team won both, did they get double award? Answers to those deserve to be in the article.213.149.61.3 (talk) 17:01, 15 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic