Talk:Tashkent Declaration
 | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on January 10, 2018 and January 10, 2021. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
_without_national_boundaries.svg)
WikiProject class rating edit
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 20:02, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
pakistani peoples point of view not mentioned edit
the tashkent agreement resulted in president ayub khans fall because people of pakistan viewed it as a sell out as pakistan had captured more indian terrirtories as compared to india, and these lands were returned by president ayub khan by keeping a leinient stance towards india, this shud hav been mentioned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.153.94.28 (talk) 07:27, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
- I agree with the fact that 'The power of Ayub Khan Subsided after the pact' this has also been verified by a neutral source HISTORICAL OVERVIEW of Pakistan by US Dept. of State ( http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/3453.htm#history) . But i dont agree with statement that "Pakistan conquered more land" this was a propaganda spread by the Pakistan army to hide their losses in the 1965 war. Please refer the full article Indo-Pakistani_War_of_1965for more details and a neutral perspective. --dBigXray (talk) 22:06, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
Consequences of the Tashkent Declaration edit
The power of Ayub Khan declined after Pakistan lost the 1965 war. this can even be verified from a neutral Source Pakistan:HISTORICAL OVERVIEW US Dept. of State http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/3453.htm#history . Besides the consequences and aftermath of this declaration are important to be discussed in short. Please do not remove this subsection. --dBigXray (talk) 22:03, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
State department is not a neutral source, Its a department of the US government. This same state department also said "Iraq had weapons of mass destruction". The end result of the war was a stalemate but one that Pakistan won because it was a much smaller state and it defended it territory after it was invaded on sept 6 1965.
Also removed the 1971 war, Its irrelevant to the Tashkent declaration unless you want to mention that India violated the Tashkent declaration by arming and funding and wet nursing the Mukhti Bahini. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.52.141.95 (talk) 17:13, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:52, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:59, 5 December 2020 (UTC)