Pushing agendas edit

GorgeCustersSabre continues to claim everything which presents this man negatively is pushing an agenda when it is factual information. Middle-eastfactcheck (talk) 14:50, 25 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

It is not balanced and even the source isn’t balanced. I don’t mind any negative coverage. I have no axe to grind. I’m not a follower of Muhammad Taqi Usmani. I just want to see the maintenance of a neutral tone. Wikipedia requires citations to reliable and authoritative third-party sources. Two good sets of Wikipedia guidelines that I have found really useful can be found HERE, regarding verifiability and HERE, regarding the need to maintain a neutral point of view. George Custer's Sabre (talk) 14:53, 25 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

List of books edit

Perhaps the sections about books should be separated and moved to a different title like Muhammad Taqi Usmani bibliography and name a few major ones in the Books section of this article. This looks very weird. ─ The Aafī (talk) 15:25, 12 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

GorgeCustersSabre What is your idea? ─ The Aafī (talk) 18:20, 12 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Vice regent: Ideas? ─ The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 18:24, 18 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
I agree with the clean up TheAafi. We should still mention his most significant works in this article.VR talk 17:57, 19 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Thanks VR. I'm working on this, and I hope once I fix the bibliography article, I'll try fixing the issues here. Thanks for your kind response. ─ The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 18:00, 19 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:53, 20 October 2021 (UTC)Reply