This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Taoist philosophy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taoism, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.TaoismWikipedia:WikiProject TaoismTemplate:WikiProject TaoismTaoism articles
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Elsewhere on Wikipedia Dao seems to be favored as the romanization for 道 because Dao is what is used in Hanyu pinyin. This page uses tao which is from the outdated wade-giles system. It seems this should be changed.
Nosterp2145 (talk) 04:08, 30 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
When half the citations are from one book, I wonder about objectivity. The fact that the history is completely at variance with other sources is not something I'm qualified to address. But I suggest this page needs to be looked at by an objective expert. 24.8.116.137 (talk) 18:36, 6 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
