This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject United States HistoryTemplate:WikiProject United States HistoryUnited States History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
I didn't add this template because I think the article is written badly or misrepresents the facts, but to give readers a warning that this topic is the subject of much conjecture and uncertainty. If there's a better template to put that idea across, I would encourage someone to use it instead of "Disputed." Docmcconl (talk) 00:33, 2 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Why don't you just add some sourced text describing the dispute? ·:· Will Beback·:· 00:40, 2 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Since you don't actually dispute any of the facts in the article, I don't think the Disputed template is appropriate. That the reality of the warrant is controversial is clearly stated in the article. Therefore I propose removing the Disputed template, and will do so unless there is objection. Tms (talk) 21:08, 6 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
Proposed deletion because of lack of verifiabilityedit
Latest comment: 12 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
The article has been noted as unsourced since 2007 and it is almost 2011.
This article hasn't sufficient reliable sources that an average person can check and fails WP:VERIFY and [[[WP:RS]]. --Javaweb (talk) 23:17, 19 December 2010 (UTC)JavawebReply
I added two recent scholarly books from 2008 and 2009 that cover the case, and also deleted un-sourced material that is not referenced by any popular or scholarly source. Rjensen (talk) 01:18, 20 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for the references. The reference from Harvard press looks good.
"Shattering the Truth: The Slandering of Abraham Lincoln"
Author Dennis W. Brandt
Publisher Booksurge Llc, 2009
ISBN9781439229323
I'm considering deleting the reference because:
1. It's not easily found in libraries. worldcat.org, the metacatalog of libraries shows none having this book.
2. It was self-published via Booksurge
3. Amazon shows it as rarely purchased: ~873,900 books sold more. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Javaweb (talk • contribs) 03:03, 20 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
I deleted Brandt as a source because it is not reliable. This appears to be a self-published book by an author without any credentials on the matter. ~~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by DLTielhard (talk • contribs) 04:28, 8 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
With the new sources I just added I think theee is little doubt that this is a well sourced claim even a probable one now that we have 3 sources Kalmenb (talk) 05:22, 9 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
