| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
editDr. Sonn never criticizes Malik Asad in "A Brief History..." nor does she, through that non-existent criticism, encourage violence towards women. Malik Asad isn't even mentioned in "A Brief History..." Please check your sources before posting blatant lies. 128.239.47.174 04:35, 11 October 2007 (UTC)Mastapd
- Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Perspicacite 06:04, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
My apologies, I meant Malik Anas. "A Brief History..." is only 190 some odd pages long. I fail to see how your citation of a page in the 500's fits. I hope you can remedy this, otherwise I'm going to have to seek arbitration on the matter. (edit: Malik ibn Anas is only found on pgs 37, 40 and 41, none of which offer any criticism of either of his ahadith, Al-Muwata and Al-Mudawana ) Best regards 68.13.200.71 15:18, 11 October 2007 (UTC)mastapd
Perspicacite Please, I am asking you to fix your citation, or somehow provide a valid source for your claims regarding Dr. Sonn's work. If not, a C&D through official channels within Wikipedia (mediation and arbitration) will be sought.Mastapd 20:19, 13 October 2007 (UTC)mastapd
- The full book is available for viewing on Google. The book is just under 200 pages, so the page number is wrong. Malik Ibn Anas is, I think, mentioned only once in the book (on page 37), and not as an attack. So the book does not appear to be an attack on a Anas, so I'll remove that. I'm not an expert, but it appears to me to discuss Islamic law, society and reform in general terms. --h2g2bob (talk) 23:13, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
- Mastapd - please remember to assume good faith about other editors. Wikipedia uses discussion as the first step in dispute resolution, and as a part of all subsequent steps. It is therefore vital to treat other editors' positions respectfully. --h2g2bob (talk) 23:39, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Mastapd is a vandal who has used multiple sockpuppets. The content is fine, do not remove sourced material. I would appreciate a source for all content you add. Perspicacite 04:59, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
I had been assuming good faith, trying to use discussion, initially, but Perspicacite has continually refused correct the apparent errors. I am not a vandal, and have never used sockpuppets. I began work on reforming this bio after an interview with Doctor Sonn, regarding work I am doing on a comparison of the decline of Islam and the decline of American Civilization. Thank you h2g2bob for helping. 24.9.122.252 16:49, 14 October 2007 (UTC) mastapd
- Perspicacite, I acknowledge there have been a lot of single purpose accounts editing this page, which may or may not be sockpuppets. However, mastapd has a valid point. Do you have any answer on the book source issue? The Google Books link shows only 200 pages - can you double-check that you have the right book.
- Also, I thought that putting the bibliography in bullet form would not be controversial - what's your view on that? --h2g2bob (talk) 22:09, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Upon further reflection I really dont care how bad this page gets. Do what you want. Perspicacite 23:52, 14 October 2007 (UTC)