Talk:Tafel equation

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 2803:9800:9504:7B33:F99C:D870:9B01:3FE3 in topic Molar or Elemental Units?
==Graphed quantity seems unrelated to text==

The graph shows η(V), but η is not discussed in the article. John Y (talk) 11:28, 25 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Missing descrption in "Alternative form" section edit

The description of n is missing JorgeDAS85 (talk) 08:07, 22 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Molar or Elemental Units? edit

In Overview of Terms,   is used, whereas in Equation in case of non-negligible mass transfer,   is used. But the two are equivalent ― one works with units of moles, the other with units of elemental charges. In my view, only one option should be used throughout. 2001:7C0:100:1234:0:0:0:59 (talk) 11:38, 12 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

the fact that more references are devoted to this non-issue, than to the actual topic of this article, is kinda puzzling. k/e=R/F is not some obscure wisdom that requires three references 2803:9800:9504:7B33:F99C:D870:9B01:3FE3 (talk) 04:23, 15 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Second Part of Overview of Terms is somewhat cyclic. edit

It is good to break down the slope A into its constituent physical parameters. However, the equations stated simply boil down to  , which is already required in the definition of  . So the statement "It can be shown theoretically that ..." is a tautology by definition of   and should be re-phrased. 2001:7C0:100:1234:0:0:0:59 (talk) 11:54, 12 January 2022 (UTC)Reply