Talk:TIROS-1
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the TIROS-1 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
What is TIROS? edit
Dont you wonder weather Tiros was a geostationary satellite or a polar orbiting satellite?! My opinion is that TIROS was a geostationary satellite because if not dont you think it would mention that it had been near the northern area of the world. or is it that the Tiros was its own Satellite and if it was what was it really used for arnt two satellites enough. --67.70.38.147 16:39, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Why? edit
Dont you wonder why Didnt they keep TORIS-1 and Vandeguard. those two satilittes were our first. they should have at least put it on display somewhere. Not only this but why did they make Noaa and nasa they were the last to launch since the Nimbus program. i mean come on how long ago was that. also was tiros just a little starter because it just gave the nimbus program the whole thing then stepped aside,for the noaa and the nasa to take its place and launch. if that was supposed to happen in the beggining why didnt they do that before or why didnt they make another one exactly like tiros yet different and such.i mean they were going to just push it aside later on. and if they did push it aside for a reason like it had technical dificulty problems then fix it! so i ask why why did they? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.70.38.147 (talk) 17:11, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
typo about altitude edit
"With the wide angle lens, the camera provided a clear view of earth from space 750 miles away."
Should be 750 kilometers Throckmorton Guildersleeve (talk) 14:01, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018) edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on TIROS-1. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120614035813/http://www.campevans.org/_CE/html/tiros1-2.html to http://campevans.org/_CE/html/tiros1-2.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120426194739/http://www.campevans.org/_CE/html/mm-1960-04-07-p1-tiros-signal-pilots-fly-photos-to-NASA.html to http://campevans.org/_CE/html/mm-1960-04-07-p1-tiros-signal-pilots-fly-photos-to-NASA.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:27, 21 January 2018 (UTC)