Talk:TCG Anadolu
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
Reference clutter edit
- While lack of sourcing is somewhat of an ongoing problem on Wikipedia there can also be an over-abundance of citations. Providing one or two reliable sources is mostly sufficient unless there is controversial material or to prevent linkrot. Another reason to use so many references, that doesn't seem to be the case here, would be reference bombardment as an attempt to bolster WP:notability. At the very least redundantly listing the same sources is needless repetition. We really only need to provide a reference for material that is challenged or is likely to be challenged.
- Per WP:PAIC citations really need to be placed at the end of the passage they support which is usually the end of a sentence or paragraph on the first instance of use. Otr500 (talk)
Infobox edit
While citing sources in the infobox maybe necessary there is never a reason to clutter the box with 11 instances of the same two sources. Otr500 (talk)
Lead edit
The purpose of the lead is as an introduction to the article and a "summary of its most important contents". This means that with possible rare exceptions content in the lead should be found in the body of the article. Concerning lead sourcing, the MOS states "and be carefully sourced as appropriate". Further down MOS:CITELEAD provides that any lead sourcing follow "challenged or likely to be challenged", usually on controversial material, and if the lead summaries sourced content found in the body of the article that is unlikely to happen so a lead can be perfectly fine without a single source. Instances of three, four, or even six citations is totally unnecessary. There is no mandate or prohibition but many better classed articles either do not use lead citations or possibly only one or two. Otr500 (talk)
Article body edit
The Design and specifications section contains 15 citations to the same reference and 14 of those are in the same paragraph. The Construction subsection has four citations used redundantly on adjoining sentences and two of those are the same as the one used 15 times already. Otr500 (talk)
Maintenance edit
For readability as well as article aesthetics many of the citations can be trimmed. I am just getting my feet wet again after a break and have too many irons in the fire. If this remains unchanged I will see about some trimming. Otr500 (talk) 07:22, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:07, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:52, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:37, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:37, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:52, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:23, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Distinctions of the ship edit
What about mentioning some distinctions of this ship, such as;
- First Aircraft Carrier of the Turkish navy and the Islamic world
- First Aircraft Carrier designed specifically to carry UAVs
What would you say? Yuzerneim (talk) 10:57, 15 October 2023 (UTC)