This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The article currently claims that "The novel's reissue uses the nom de plume Wyatt Harlan." However, the source used for that is a dead link on a publisher's website. The archive of that page indicates that it was not a "nom de plume" so much as Gertler had changed her name... but the veracity of even that is in question, as it does not look like the publisher issued the book. The Amazon listing for the Harlan-labeled edition indicates a publication date of 2030... which as a publisher myself, I can tell you that books don't really get solicited eight years in advance, particularly reissues. Clearly, this was something that was on the schedule, had a cover made up for it, then taken off the schedule, for reasons we don't know. As such, there's not much point to including this dubious sentence. I will not do the edit myself both because I am avoiding article editing at this time and because there may be a misperception of a conflict of interest. (I am of no known relation to T.) I recommend someone else evaluate this and, if they agree, remove that sentence and its reference. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 20:51, 28 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}