|WikiProject Statistics||(Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)|
|WikiProject Medicine||(Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)|
Shouldn't it be mentioned that a systematic review is not only a review of biomedical research but many other types of healthcare related reserach?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 22:20, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- Does this apply in other fields aside from healthcare as well? Certainly other fields do literature reviews; when those reviews are tightly focused around a particular question, is that not a systematic review? ImpIn | (t - c) 08:43, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
Mandatory for all professionals?
Either the universal qualifier should be removed or the set of individuals designated specified. Is this saying that RNs. physician assistants, EMTs, etc. for example, are either not medical professionals or should be capable of conducting a systematic review? 22.214.171.124 (talk) 19:30, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- OK, I'm an american and it's common here to call just about anybody a professional. I didn't know until reading the professional article that the term might be restricted to doctoral graduates which usage would make (much more) sense although I still think the universal qualifier is overreaching. 126.96.36.199 (talk) 19:34, 27 February 2009 (UTC)