Talk:Swindon and Cricklade Railway

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

Wiltshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wiltshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wiltshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WiltshireWikipedia:WikiProject WiltshireTemplate:WikiProject WiltshireWiltshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Swindon & Cricklade Railway.

Overhaul edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

This article is unreferenced and contains multiple references to "currently", "expected in 2007" and "to be completed in 2008". It reads as though much has been lifted from a website or leaflet somewhere. The internal links need updating (I suspect that Hunslet Engine Company is meant, not Hunslet), for example, and the external link is broken. The diagram of the track contains more "proposed" and "conjectural" track than "actually used". Unreferenced factoids and phone numbers periodically need removing from the article. Most of the article is templates and lists.

I originally intended to tidy it up but, after puzzling over it, I think an editor is needed who can, for example, assess how important it is to list every engine ever owned in an article (including those which are now listed as having left the railway). I confess I fail to see the importance of such detail, but perhaps this is normal for railways..

Telsa (talk) 15:36, 8 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

External link now fixed.

'expected in 2007' - such comments are rather common on the pages of UK preserved railways. Whether it is the work of a single editor, I could not say, but the locomotive lists for these pages tend to be full of trivial restoration detail (that belongs on the railway's own website) and lazy linking (as here to Hunslet).

Listing every locomotive is not unreasonable, and whether it is working/not, restored/not etc. Someone looking up this page before visiting the railway might be interested in seeing which engines are there, or else, someone researching an engine type might be interested to know where 'real' examples may be found.

The track diagram is accurate. The fact that sections are proposed/conjectural is just a reflection on what the railway is planning to do.

EdJogg 23:10, 8 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

I've removed some of the material in the overview section since so much of the material was unverified, and I could find little information on the railway's website. I've also trimmed the route diagram. Hertzsprung (talk) 21:40, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

That's fine. Nothing of significance was lost from the text -- it was mostly repetition anyway. EdJogg (talk) 01:08, 11 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Picture Reference edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This photo of Blunsdon station (site of) in 1961 has been uploaded to the Geograph project, if someone cares to upload it to Commons?

-- EdJogg (talk) 09:10, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic