Talk:Sweet Thing (David Bowie song)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Page Move edit
I am considering moving this page to Sweet Thing (David Bowie Song) to match Sweet Thing (Van Morrison song), which at the moment only has a disambig link from the top of the bowie page. Create a disambiguation page to reflect NPOV?
Please throw in your twopence worth.
Dvorak (wtkwhite) 17:48, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- As neither song is clearly and undoubtedly the prime usage, I agree this makes sense. --Dweller (talk) 10:29, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- Hmmm, this seems unnecessary (POV of a disambiguation suffix?) but non-controversial, please go ahead. Also, by a quick glance, both articles don't strike me as very notable (and yeah, I may be wrong). -- Pepve (talk) 14:30, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, and note the caps: Sweet Thing (David Bowie song), not Sweet Thing (David Bowie Song). -- Pepve (talk) 14:31, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- The NPOV was supposed to be treating similar articles and two songwriters the same. But notwithstanding that, as Dweller says, neither is more notable or more likely to be an intended destination. --Dvorak (wtkwhite) (Talk) 17:07, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- Speaking as a casual fan of both artists, I agree with the above, and say go for it. -Freekee (talk) 03:52, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- Hi! FYI, there is Sweet Thing (Chaka Khan song) too. Oda Mari (talk) 18:16, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the intel. that complicates things. Are there any others? Dvorak (wtkwhite) (Talk) 22:42, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- I have no idea. But there's Sweet Things (song). Oda Mari (talk) 05:27, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Sounds good. Make Sweet Thing a disambiguation page, which lists all four songs. --Dweller (talk) 10:52, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Diamond dogs.jpg edit
The image Image:Diamond dogs.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --00:22, 24 May 2008 (UTC)