Talk:Swarovski Optik

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Swarovski Optik article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Another photo edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've put another photo in the Commons in case anyone wants to incorporate it into the article.

Swarovski CL 8x25

--ML5 (talk) 20:40, 11 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Apparent promo edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Much of this reads like a promo. Appears a lot of the content came from the below IP edit.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Swarovski_Optik&oldid=1052242077

Much of the edit has already been removed for this reason. Parts of it also seem fabricated: the claim Swarovski Optik has a royal warrant is nonsense, the warrant is only for the jewellery business. Given the biased language and questionable accuracy seems highly likely the IP editor has a conflict of interest as per WP:DUCK.

Consensus to remove? John wiki: If you have a problem, don't mess with my puppy... 22:45, 15 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic