Talk:Svenskeren
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2020 and 13 March 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Danaorow. Peer reviewers: Thaoduong98.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:58, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Breitbart edit
I've removed a citation to Breitbart.com because it's not a reliable source. The content is probably accurate for this article (which after all is not related to politics), but nevertheless the source isn't considered a reliable one under our policies (see the WP:RSN archives), especially where the content involves (1) a legal dispute (an intrinsically sensitive area) and (2) a living person. If the fact at issue is important, it will in any case be covered by some other source somewhere. Neutralitytalk 20:28, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for adding the Daily Dot article - that source is fine with me as a replacement source. Breitbart should still go, of course, for the reasons identified above and because it's now-duplicative. Neutralitytalk 20:39, 26 August 2016 (UTC)