Talk:Suzuki Bolan
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Arotparaarms in topic Hmm, What about the Suzuki Ravi?
 | This article is written in Pakistani English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Let's Make a page for this Chunk Beast! edit
Let's all contribute to make this page, a better place! Arotparaarms (talk) 12:05, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Possible source for sales numbers edit
Yearly reports dating back to 2007 from Pakistan Automotive Manufacturers Association, also available in chart format. Broc (talk) 14:44, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- @750h+ please check out the sources above. The table displays the data from June because that's how the PAMA reports (from June to June instead of for a calendar year). If you want to improve it, let's discuss, but the numbers check out with the official ones from PAMA. Broc (talk) 13:35, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- Alright @Broc, I'll check it out! Arotparaarms (talk) 07:58, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Here's a code of a Wiki table I'll use,
- == Financial Performance ==
Year ended Revenue (PKR thousand) Operating income (PKR thousand) Net income (PKR thousand) Total assets (PKR thousand) Total equity (PKR thousand) 31 December 2012[1] 
58,531,137
1,499,760
978,022
21,384,864
15,800,884
31 December 2013[2] 51,061,333
2,353,439
1,849,357
23,811,277
17,645,158
31 December 2014[3] 53,664,947
2,623,394
1,921,894
28,354,159
19,236,682
31 December 2015[4] 84,548,757
8,685,171
5,842,671
37,451,987
24,679,238
31 December 2016[5] 76,516,040
4,415,236
2,772,635
37,851,965
26,216,907
31 December 2017[6] 101,811,611
5,619,214
3,825,821
50,910,467
29,549,716
31 December 2018[7] 119,853,898
2,082,936
1,298,108
61,509,849
29,232,865
31 December 2019[8] 116,548,013
(4,951,744)
(2,920,485)
77,659,826
25,950,886
31 December 2020[9] 42,384,482
(1,888,054)
(1,378,115)
66,647,356
24,292,441
31 December 2021[9] 160,082,255
3,795,407
2,679,467
91,989,970
26,826,197
31 December 2022[10] 202,466,737
(3,142,540)
(6,336,922)
110,084,368
19,770,548
- ^ "Suzuki Pakistan Annual Report 2012" (PDF). Suzuki Pakistan. 31 December 2012. Retrieved 7 November 2023.
- ^ "Suzuki Pakistan Annual Report 2013" (PDF). Suzuki Pakistan. 31 December 2013. Retrieved 7 November 2023.
- ^ "Suzuki Pakistan Annual Report 2014" (PDF). Suzuki Pakistan. 31 December 2014. Retrieved 7 November 2023.
- ^ "Suzuki Pakistan Annual Report 2015" (PDF). Suzuki Pakistan. 31 December 2015. Retrieved 7 November 2023.
- ^ "Suzuki Pakistan Annual Report 2016" (PDF). Suzuki Pakistan. 31 December 2016. Retrieved 7 November 2023.
- ^ "Suzuki Pakistan Annual Report 2017" (PDF). Suzuki Pakistan. 31 December 2017. Retrieved 7 November 2023.
- ^ "Suzuki Pakistan Annual Report 2018" (PDF). Suzuki Pakistan. 31 December 2018. Retrieved 7 November 2023.
- ^ "Suzuki Pakistan Annual Report 2019" (PDF). Suzuki Pakistan. 31 December 2019. Retrieved 7 November 2023.
- ^ a b "Suzuki Pakistan Annual Report 2021" (PDF). Suzuki Pakistan. 31 December 2021. Retrieved 7 November 2023.
- ^ "Suzuki Pakistan Annual Report 2022" (PDF). Suzuki Pakistan. 31 December 2022. Retrieved 7 November 2023.
- I'm going to change it and get the numbers of the Bolan in there,
- Cheers, Arotparaarms (talk) 07:59, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Added a Table :D
- Thanks for providing the sources!
- Cheers, Arotparaarms (talk) 08:43, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Should I remove the "expansion" Banner? edit
The article is now matured and is only just a stub, it does need cleanup though, Arotparaarms (talk) 14:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Project Banner edit
{{WikiProject Automobiles |class= C |importance= low}}
Is my estimated ranking for the Suzuki Bolan Am I correct or is it higher/Lower? Arotparaarms (talk) 10:32, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Please look over the assessment criteria, and maybe read some B-class articles to see how much content they have and how they are written. This article in its current state is far too sparse and lacking a lot of important information. --Sable232 (talk) 16:20, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, Thanks for the info mate!
- I guess I'll rate it "C" until further notice!
- Cheers, Arotparaarms (talk) 14:04, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Image for the Suzuki Ravi edit
Is there an image falling under Fair use of the Suzuki Ravi? The closest to the ravi is this [[1]] car..... Arotparaarms (talk) 00:24, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
![[1]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:SuzukiCarry8th.jpg){kind=link}
Regarding the sales number edit
@750h+ You removed a large chunk of the sales, I don’t think the sales are saying they were bought on 1 June alone, but between 1 June of that year and the precious. Also, I think 1 June isn’t random, some companies use it as a fiscal year. VirtualVagabond (talk) 13:26, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- previous
- VirtualVagabond (talk) 13:26, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- I think that needs to be specified if so. 750h+ (talk) 13:57, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- 750h+ Then go ahead and specify it. But please check the sources before removing large chunks of material. Broc (talk) 16:19, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- That burden isn’t on me, it is on the large contributors of the page. I’d rather just merge this quite unremarkable car back into the Suzuki Carry page. 750h+ (talk) 21:27, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- 750h+ Then go ahead and specify it. But please check the sources before removing large chunks of material. Broc (talk) 16:19, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Hmm, What about the Suzuki Ravi? edit
Should we expand on the Ravi's section or give it a mention and make a whole new article? Arotparaarms (talk) 14:05, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Arotparaarms an article is only justified if there is substantial material. Right now there is only a small section. Considering that Suzuki Ravi already redirects here, I would leave it as it is. If while editing you realize that the section on the Ravi has become long enough to warrant its own article, you can proceed with the move then. Broc (talk) 10:03, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yes @Broc, you're right it doesn't require an article, but the main point is that the section needs to be bigger, I am working on it and hope you can too,
- Cheers, Arotparaarms (talk) 16:12, 5 April 2024 (UTC)