Talk:Suzette Kent

Latest comment: 10 days ago by AusLondonder in topic Response to proposal for deletion

Response to proposal for deletion edit

I don't understand the motivation of AusLondonder in proposing deletion. Sources, such as the national archives are imminantly verifyable. I don't see any effort to verify. Some examples easily accessable:

Suzette Kent | IBM Center for The Business of Government

HHRG-117-GO24-Bio-KentS-20220120.pdf (house.gov)

Burt Harris (talk) 20:30, 29 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Two primary sources. Have you heard of WP:BASIC? "People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. AusLondonder (talk) 23:26, 29 April 2024 (UTC)Reply