Talk:Sutton United 2–1 Coventry City (1989)

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Vaticidalprophet in topic Did you know nomination
Featured articleSutton United 2–1 Coventry City (1989) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 11, 2021.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 18, 2021Good article nomineeListed
May 6, 2021Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 5, 2021.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that a team including bricklayers, assistant bank managers and insurance clerks defeated Coventry City in the third round of the FA Cup in 1989?
Current status: Featured article

Move discussion in progress edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Cardiff City F.C. 2–1 Leeds United F.C. which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 19:21, 16 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Sutton's progression edit

Round Date Opposition (H/A) Score Ref
Preliminary 29 October 1988 Walton & Hersham (H) 1–1 [1]
Preliminary (replay) 1 November 1988 Walton & Hersham (A) 3–0 [2]
First round 19 November 1988 Dagenham (A) 4–0 [3]
Second round 10 December 1988 Aylesbury United (A) 1–0 [4]

References

  1. ^ "FA Cup – Fourth qualifying round". The Observer. 30 October 1988. p. 24. Retrieved 15 March 2021 – via Newspapers.com.
  2. ^ "FA Cup – Fourth qualifying round replays". The Guardian. 2 November 1988. p. 18. Retrieved 15 March 2021 – via Newspapers.com.
  3. ^ "FA Cup First Round". The Observer. 20 November 1988. p. 20. Retrieved 15 March 2021 – via Newspapers.com.
  4. ^ "FA Cup Second Round". The Observer. 11 December 1988. p. 20. Retrieved 15 March 2021 – via Newspapers.com.

Sources edit

History edit

Third round edit

Fourth round edit

Legacy edit

Did you know nomination edit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk) 21:29, 31 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

  • ... that non-League Sutton United's defeat of Coventry City in 1989 has been described as "one of the greatest FA Cup giant-killing acts of all time"?
    • ALT1:... that a team including bricklayers, assistant bank managers and insurance clerks defeated Coventry City in the third round of the FA Cup in 1989?

5x expanded by The Rambling Man (talk) and Amakuru (talk). Nominated by The Rambling Man (talk) at 20:50, 15 March 2021 (UTC).Reply

  •   Date and length fine. AGF on book and paywall sources used. I think it might be better if you can expand the link beyond just "defeated" @The Rambling Man: @Amakuru:. I slightly prefer ALT1, especially if you say Coventry were pros. QPQ done, no close paraphrasing. Good to go. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 17:13, 16 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Sutton United 2–1 Coventry City (1989)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kosack (talk · contribs) 08:31, 16 March 2021 (UTC)Reply


Picking this up, review coming as soon as possible. Kosack (talk) 08:31, 16 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Infobox and lead edit

Background edit

Summary edit

Details edit

That's all I've got. Great stuff, placed on hold for now. Kosack (talk) 09:46, 17 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Kosack cheers, all addressed I think, and your speedy review very much appreciated. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 10:14, 17 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Looks good to me, happy to promote. Kosack (talk) 13:19, 18 March 2021 (UTC)Reply