Talk:Super Fantasy Zone

File:Super fantasy zone.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Super fantasy zone.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 5 June 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Super fantasy zone.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:03, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Super Fantasy Zone/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kung Fu Man (talk · contribs) 02:20, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Gameplay

1. I feel like some description of what Oopa looks like could make that first paragraph a bit meatier. Also looking up gameplay on youtube, can't this character fly and walk? Is there a difference gameplay wise between the two.

   It seems like walking is an upgrade, so not typical gameplay. Though I instead decided to include it as part of his description.

1. Small thing, but I feel weapon loadout is the wrong term here and gives a different impression with the subsequent upgrades not being all weapons.

References

1. If possible I do feel the magazine citations could use page numbers, but I understand if some are not able to.

Spotcheck: checked references [14, [15], [17], [26], [27] (latter two confirmed by Internet Archive). Information is factually cited.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 02:20, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Hey, sorry, I'll fix up the refs in a bit. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 03:17, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Took care of them myself, wasn't able to online scans of a few of them but satisfied with the results overall. Passing.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 10:45, 23 February 2024 (UTC)