Talk:Sundance Bilson-Thompson
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
.jpg){kind=small}
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Not an active researcher edit
From what I gather, this researcher was a postdoctoral scientist for some time, but has left academia many years ago. There is no record of any scientific publications since 2012 [1]. I recommend deleting this article due to lack of significance. Dongdong42 (talk) 11:59, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
Untitled edit
In response to the PROFTEST concern, added a brief explanation of why SBT's research is potentially interesting (i.e. what it means, not just what field it's in). Kickaha 23:30, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Not vandalism edit
It would be easy to assume that "He is currently returning to Australia by bicycle" is a kind of vandalism. It isn't; follow the link to his blog for confirmation. Groogle (talk) 03:42, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
Criticism section unfitting edit
The "criticism" expressed in the section with the same name is criticism of Sundance's paper. Therefore I suggest that this section does not belong here, because the referred blog entry by L. Motl criticises the paper and not the person. One sentence in the blog ("Sorry, Lee, but I simply can't believe that you're serious.") pretty much emphasises that Motls criticism is in no way directed to Sundance Osland Bilson-Thompson but rather Lee Smolin.
I will therefore delete said section.
Greets, Axel Cholewa. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cholewa (talk • contribs) 13:58, 4 April 2012 (UTC)