Talk:Stregheria/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by H1nkles in topic GA Reassessment

GA Reassessment edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

I will be doing the GA Reassessment on this article as part of the GA Sweeps project. H1nkles (talk) 20:15, 15 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

I am concerned that the "Usage of the word" sub section has no in-line citations. Books are listed but there should be references to specific portions of the book if those books are used to support the assertions in the section. I also added a [citation needed] template to the Practices section as there are several assertions as to what the followers of this faith believe without any in-line citations to support them.

Per WP:LEAD the lead is to be a summary of the article, covering all the points in the article. The Lead brings up information that is not found in the article, namely about the dieties. This information should be found in the article.

I'm concerned about the formatting of the references as well. Websites should have at least the publisher listed along with the accessdate per WP:CITE. Also the following links are dead,7, 8, 10, 12, 16, 17.

At this point I feel that the article does not meet the WP:GA Criteria, I will hold the article for a week. If there are any questions please feel free to contact me at my talk page. H1nkles (talk) 20:36, 15 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

I do not see any work having been done on the suggestions I made to keep the article at GA. Consequently I will delist the article for not meeting current GA Criteria related to MOS compliance and referencing. H1nkles (talk) 15:07, 22 June 2009 (UTC)Reply