Talk:Strangford Lough

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Eviolite in topic Possible copyright problem

Assessment comment edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Strangford Lough/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
The article tells the story of the recent turbine installed in Strangford Lough, but implies, without making it clear, that the turbine is already supplying electricity. To the best of my knowledge (including looking at the references in the article), the installation in late May was successful, and was to be followed by a 12-week test period, after which the turbine was to start regularly supplying electricity. It's been well over 12 weeks since then. Any information on the current status of the turbine, including beginning of electricity generation or delays thereof, would be a very welcome update!

--Noam bergman (talk) 16:46, 15 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

== First tidal power generation project ? ==

This is detailed as the first estuary(?) tidal power project, but I see no difference in that description from the Rance estuary scheme which has been operational for 47 years, except that the turbine is not in a barrage-wall. Is that supposed to be a significant difference ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.64.47.44 (talk) 09:23, 18 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 09:25, 18 March 2015 (UTC). Substituted at 07:08, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Strangford Lough. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:17, 29 November 2017 (UTC)Reply


Possible copyright problem edit

 

This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. eviolite (talk) 21:36, 30 August 2021 (UTC)Reply