Talk:Stephen Hughes (politician)

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Dunarc in topic Misleading statement?

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Stephen Hughes (politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:13, 15 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Misleading statement? edit

I think the statement "In 2009 he took 25% of the vote, the highest of the three elected MEPs in the region, and the highest share of the vote for Labour in the UK" is rather misleading. The electoral system for MEPs in the UK at the time meant that you voted for a party who had already ranked their candidates, rather than an individual (unless they were an independent). It was Labour that polled 25% rather than Stephen Hughes, who was elected as he was top of Labour's list (just us the other two MEPs elected were top of their parties' lists). The statement also does not make clear that the 25% polled by Labour was a notably lower than Labour had polled in North East England in 2004 (34.1%) and indeed represented a bigger drop in vote share than Labour experienced in, for instance, the West Midlands seat. Thus I think there is an attempt to imply here (possibly unintentionally) an achievement that is not strictly accurate. Dunarc (talk) 20:30, 25 May 2022 (UTC) Modified by Dunarc (talk) 22:52, 26 June 2022 (UTC)Reply