Talk:Stella Ross-Craig

Latest comment: 10 years ago by 213.104.113.175 in topic Untitled

Untitled edit

The timeline doesn't make sense; if she was born in 1906, she would have been 96 or 97 when she had her exhibition.

That's about right. She was 95 for the first one, although she couldn't attend. A case of better late than never.FlowerpotmaN·(t) 19:41, 3 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Wonderful work. Unless I am going crazy, I seem to remember seeing a show of her work in the gallery at Kew in the late 1990s. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.104.113.175 (talk) 20:19, 18 March 2014 (UTC)Reply