Talk:Steal This Film

Information gleaned from the film.

<nowiki>
Swedish Secretary of State - Dan Eliasson:
Rick Falkvinge - Swedish Pirate Party:
John Kennedy - President Universal Music International:
Alex Cox - Film Maker
Richard Dryfuss - Actor (tomorrow never dies newsnight)
John Kennedy - President, Universal Music International

"Thanks to: Alan Toner, Altermarkf, brokep, #copyplot, Daniela, #digitalhippie, The Edenbog Cafe, EC8OR, Elisabeth Stark, Feliz, Helen Liston, Dr. J.J. King, Jan Gerber, Magnus "Monki" Eriksson, <OMNIHAL> Pale Torsson, The Pirate ay, PiratByran, The Pirate Party, Rasmus Flischer, Sebastian Luetgert, Sousys, Southpaw, 

Thieving Thanks To:
CAN: "She brings the rain", "Why must I be the thief"
John Carpenter: "They Live"
Michaelangelo Antonioni: "Zabriskie Point"
Public Enemy: "Burn hollywood burn"
Roland Emmerich "The day after tomorrow"
Robert Luxemburg Burn Hollywood Burn

Further "subliminal messages"
4:52-4:54 Resist, Share, Enjoy
5:05 Copy
5:19 Paste
6:35 Filesharing is not Stealing
19:40 But your paltry income is the movie industry's profit
19:41 But your lack of health insurance is the labor market's profit
19:42 But your lifelong debt is the financial market's profit
20:00 In fact, the actors in this spot earned more money in one day than this pathetic working class of intellectual property would earn in one month
25:20 Photo of sign: "Obey"

--Lexein 02:40, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but descibing these mesages as subliminal is entirely wrong. Wikipedia defines subliminal messages as "a signal or message embedded in another object, designed to pass below the normal limits of perception". The 'messages' are captions responding to the content of the film, such as actor interviews. They are clear, easily perceptible and therefore cannot be described as subliminal.

Describing the captions as "subliminal messages" denotes that the film intends to brainwash the viewer. I highly suspect that whoever wrote this on wikipedia opposes the subject of the film and intended to add some negativity to the article. --Sevengoods 15:36, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

I'm against conventional copyright and enjoyed this film and agreed with a lot of what they had to say but I also think that these messages are subliminal. They're only visible for a split-second. It's a shame they pulled such a stunt, really 77.99.233.169 (talk) 04:07, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the info. There was one at around 6:38 but I didn't catch it. I believe the FCC has a rule that any text appearing on the screen must be shown for at least sixteen frames (0.667 seconds). ZtObOr 03:17, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

(Excuse me not being logged in) I have checked with adobe premiere pro, these texts only appear for 1 frame, i.e. 1/30th of a second. And they are done over the film without blanking it, what's more is that they only appear when the documentry is showing the coperate's point of view. I personally am "neutral" about file sharing, but I think this video is a bit biased 165.21.155.17 (talk) 10:33, 2 May 2008 (UTC)2nd/05/2008 +8GMT, Wizongod

Copyright

Under which copyright (or -left) license is this film being released? Maikel (talk) 16:12, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

None, which would be public domain, I think.--toehead2001 (talk) 22:24, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

In the US (anyway), anything published is automatically copyright unless the author specifically releases his/her rights and puts it in the public domain. That is why there is a disclaimer on wikipedia that states that all text, including this sentence I am writing now, is under the GFDL. Else it would be subject to copyright protections, etc. Before I assumed anything, I would check the website and see. Likely it is copyrighted but very flexible in terms, like GFDL or similar. Pharmboy (talk) 22:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Note that at the end of part 2, it says that the film is copyright the League of Noble Peers. Stale Fries ^{taste better} 23:46, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Yes, and as is clarified in the FAQ (http://stealthisfilm.com/Part2/faq.php). the copyright is there so that you can steal the film 83.254.69.54 (talk) 04:04, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

I have stolen this film. It is now MINE. 90.217.29.94 (talk) 04:31, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Poor quality sources & cites

I've cleaned up and fleshed out several URL-only citations. I've left the links to wikis and blogs for others to replace with verifiable secondary sources [WP:SECONDARY]. I'll revisit in a month or two and delete them, if they're not fixed up. --Lexein (talk) 13:46, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Trial Edition is not HD

Trial Edition is definitely not HD. It is 480 p. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.46.168.56 (talk) 22:25, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Steal This Film. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090715203636/http://www.romafictionfest.it:80/content/view/full/4444 to http://www.romafictionfest.it/content/view/full/4444

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:09, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Steal This Film. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110715233816/http://www.saltspringfilmfestival.com/films2007.htm to http://www.saltspringfilmfestival.com/films2007.htm
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110531200253/http://www.aec.at/en/global/press_detail.asp?iPressID=237&iAreaID=5 to http://www.aec.at/en/global/press_detail.asp?iPressID=237&iAreaID=5

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:20, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Steal This Film. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060831025721/http://www.boingboing.net/2006/08/23/steal_this_movie_doc.html to http://www.boingboing.net/2006/08/23/steal_this_movie_doc.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://foundation.britdoc.org/festival/07/talking.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:19, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Added link about sci-hub

• Sci-Hub - network of pirated research papers, "Sci-Hub can instantly provide access to more than two-thirds of all scholarly articles", Lindsay McKenzie. Sci-Hub’s cache of pirated papers is so big, subscription journals are doomed, data analyst suggests. Science Magazine. Jul. 27, 2017. https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/07/sci-hub-s-cache-pirated-papers-so-big-subscription-journals-are-doomed-data-analyst

Onlyforwikiapps (talk) 22:22, 26 July 2021 (UTC)