Talk:Stars in Their Eyes

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Digifiend in topic Starstruck

Seen on the page: This is a stub...writer has heard of the show but is not a regular viewer! -- obviously values their sanity! -- Tarquin 12:32 14 May 2003 (UTC)

Stub edit

Hope no one minds, but I've put a stub tag at the bottom. An article about a show that's lasted over 15 years, should have a lot more information than this. ~~ Peteb16 21:17, 16 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

This article is written in the present tense, yet this show died 3 years ago. I'd change this myself (maybe I will, later) but right now I'm too busy, so I thought I'd make a note of it here for anyone who happens to drop by. --DrazharLn (talk) 00:00, 17 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

There's a comment saying; "DO NOT change is to was --" -- Why not? Why would a discontinued show not be referred to in the past tense? ~~ (talk)

New and revived series of Stars in Their Eyes edit

A revived series stars in their eyes under title name is Harry Hill’s Stars In Their Eyes it's like new revived version of Bob Says Opportunity Knocks! in 1987 it lasts over 4 series and i hope new and revived series of stars in their eyes lasts on ITV. This is KMJ good luck in 2015... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.90.91.81 (talk) 17:42, 2 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

It's better to tone down criticism edit

We Get It It's Mixed Reception On Harry Hill The Same Happened With Cat Deeley — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.33.74.137 (talk) 15:28, 14 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Unnecessary comma edit

I was wondering whether the comma after Harry Hill's name is really necessary in the sentence that begins "A revived version by Harry Hill,"Vorbee (talk) 20:38, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Starstruck edit

Shouldn't this have it's own page at Starstruck (2022 TV series)? Digifiend (talk) 22:07, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply