Talk:Stan Robb/GA1

Latest comment: 9 months ago by LunaEatsTuna in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: LunaEatsTuna (talk · contribs) 00:10, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply


Will review.  LunaEatsTuna (💬)— 00:10, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

I really like the images; they are a nice way of illustrating an article. On hold; over to you!  LunaEatsTuna (💬)— 17:15, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Copyvio check edit

Good to go. The newspaper extract from Canton Daily News is PD.

File(s) edit

All files are relevant and have a valid public domain rationale on Commoms.

Prose edit

  • The lead could be greatly expended; it should summarise some more in-depth aspects of his career.
  • In § Early life and education, I would lead with his full name as its his first mention in the body.
  • "Robb also attended for a time Mercersburg Academy." – should for a time not come after the Academy?
  • "Around 1917, he registered for World War I" – change to "Around 1917, he enlisted in World War I."
  • "with one newspaper writing" – in this context I would name the publication.
  • The last paragraph of the first section reads strangely to me. Could some elaboration perhaps be given on ""fame""?
  • "Robb had tackled a Hartford player, and Nichols" – is the comma necessary here?
  • "He registered for World War II in February 1942." – enlisted in like above.

Refs edit

Passes spotcheck on refs 5, 10, 15, 23 and 28. Was able to confirm 5 and 28 via Ancestry.com.

Others edit

  • Short description should go at the very top.
  • Recommend adding template:use X English if applicable.
  • @LunaEatsTuna: I believe I've addressed all of the issues; let me know if I missed anything or if there's anything else you'd like done. Thanks. BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:01, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.