Talk:Stan Jonathan
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Poulins.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 10:07, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Stan Jonathan edit
As each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? - No, there are a lot of missing in text citations. These parts either need to be removed or properly referenced.
Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? - The information is coming from newspaper sources, such as the Toronto Star, and the Hamilton Spectator, as well as from Youtube and greatesthockeylegends.com. These sources are neutral, and did not show any forms of bias.
Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? - Yes, at the end they briefly touch upon Stan Jonathan's criminal charges; however, it is very underrepresented in the article.