Talk:St Peter Claver College

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Drmies in topic Revert: addition of unencyclopedic content

Copyright problem removed edit

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.spcc.qld.edu.au/services.php?id=59&category=about. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:19, 13 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Revert: addition of unencyclopedic content edit

I've just removed a ton of unencyclopedic content from this article. Relevant guidelines for editing articles on schools are found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools/Article guidelines; what I removed falls foul of those guidelines. In addition, it's obvious that there is some kind of group editing going on, perhaps a class project at the school; that's fine, I suppose, but such edits need to be neutral and in accordance with our guidelines. If this continues (the history shows at least three of these episodes of mass edits by single-purpose accounts, we will have no choice but lock the article and/or block the involved editors. Please see the guidelines for what is and what is not acceptable content. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 04:37, 10 September 2013 (UTC)Reply