Talk:St Padarn's Church, Llanbadarn Fawr

comment

edit

I've extensively rewritten this article, using original research (by which as I explain later, I've used secondary sources that weren't referred to previously), where possible - I am curate at this church, so it is in my jurisdiction, as it were.Ncox (talk) 15:51, 11 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Original research

edit

The article itself specifies that it includes original research. There are also a number of weasel words, such as "It is possibly the second most important church," and uncited areas.

I have added a declaration of interest box for Noel Cox, and some citation needed tags... I'm going to look at some other content now, as this is the second article of Noel's that I've tagged, and I don't want to give the impression that I'm following one particular person! 86.181.149.124 (talk) 19:04, 4 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

I have added in-line citations. There is no original research in the Wikipedia sense, I simply meant that I had drawn together a number of disparate secondary sources, some of what hadn't been used for the history of this church. I do have an interest in the church as I work there, but I think you will find that the article is fully reference and does not have anything that could be said to be inaccurate, contentious or otherwise inappropriate.Ncox (talk) 12:03, 5 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

I would be grateful for an explanation of how this page can be "rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale".Ncox (talk) 16:11, 5 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Ncox: I've upgraded this to A-class. I think you should consider nominating it for Peer Review (I would be happy to do the reviewing) and later for Featured status. Ham II (talk) 06:27, 13 June 2015 (UTC) Thank you. I have requested a review as you suggestedNcox (talk) 15:27, 13 June 2015 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on St Padarn's Church, Llanbadarn Fawr. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:47, 21 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:37, 28 January 2023 (UTC)Reply