Talk:St Mary's Church, Ipswich

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Queensland C‑class Low‑importance

	Australia portal St Mary's Church, Ipswich is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

History and description

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The history and description sections in the Queensland Heritage Register which were used to create this article are unusually small and lacking in details. Any help with expanding these topics would be much appreciated. Kerry (talk) 06:03, 12 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

No apostrophe

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

@Kerry Raymond: The surprising lack of an apostrophe in the title, box and lead surprised me, particularly as it appears in St Mary's in the later text. I would suggest it should also be included in the title, even if was misspelled in historic or official documents. You are really continuing to do a fantastic job on Australian heritage. Much appreciated.--Ipigott (talk) 08:52, 13 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic