Talk:Spiral approach

Original Research

From article: The free links used in Wikipedia also facilitate a spiral approach, since each new link taken offers more information about a subject in a non-intrusive manner that allows the reader to keep his or her attention on the main subject.

I believe this claim is original research and is not backed up in any other way. In fact, I would argue that free links are more similar to inverted pyramid style than spiral, where relevant information is presented first, and less relevant information cascaded in a separate content space. Separate content space in inverted pyramid style is text that is further down the same article, where as in free links is a different page. --Liulk 17:57, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

sources and material for extension

• https://books.google.de/books?id=U_xdAJYkouYC&pg=PA27
• https://books.google.de/books?id=hej6LYOhlyEC&pg=PA75
• https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01421599979752?journalCode=imte20 and [1]
• http://www.curee.co.uk/node/4849
• https://www.jstor.org/stable/30211729
• http://everydaymath.uchicago.edu/about/why-it-works/spiral/
• https://www.jstor.org/stable/44428015
• https://www.jstor.org/stable/24374719
• https://www.jstor.org/stable/1320905
• https://www.jstor.org/stable/41194645

For Further Review and Incorporation

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01421599979752?journalCode=imte20

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00393541.1995.11649974

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02615470220126435