This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anarchism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anarchism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnarchismWikipedia:WikiProject AnarchismTemplate:WikiProject Anarchismanarchism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Latest comment: 19 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
This page seems like it is an advertisement for a group called "Space Hijackers". It is not written from a NPOV - see "who battle to save our streets"; "the evils of Urban Architects"
Does this article belong here? Does it just jeed to be cleaned up? Is thiis valid?
Rather agree with you but, for the moment, have made it rather more NPOV than it was and added some wikilinks to make more sense of it. --VampWillow 00:48, 31 May 2004 (UTC)Reply
As it is, this article doesn't provide much useful information and isn't very encyclopedic at all. It does indeed seem to serve primarily as a tool to advertise the group's existence. I suppose it could be edited into a better article in the future, though. Mr. Billion 04:57, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
What is this group about then? They are anti-buildings? This is a very badly written article. I don't feel I've learnt anything from it.
They're known in some circles for their antics, the article should stay, though be improved. They are not anti-buildings, but rather anti-being-controlled. Against being told what to do by design, which extends to active protest against a number of things which may incidentally have a political edge (e.g. ban on protests within 1 mile of parliament). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 161.73.37.81 (talk) 11:34, 28 April 2007 (UTC).Reply
