Non-Neutral POV edit

I think the phrase "(rather dubiously)" in the second-to-last paragraph violates the Neutral POV policy, and should be removed.

134.197.79.24 23:34, 16 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

I understand. I meant to convey that it seems doubtful that "Dr. Van Buskirk" used X-rays to examine the teeth and gums of his patients as the ad in question claims because 1) X-rays had only been discovered a year earlier; and 2) I have no evidence that Van Buskirk worked as a physician/dentist. --Skb8721 13:55, 17 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Ingredients edit

What was it made of? An important element of the article, especially because of the putative reason for its fall from favour. Anchoress 00:07, 17 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Good question. I will add that information. --Skb8721 14:00, 17 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

File:Sozo2.jpg Nominated for Deletion edit

  An image used in this article, File:Sozo2.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests November 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:46, 2 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

    • I am the creator of the image and I have now released it for all use.--Skb8721 (talk) 17:36, 10 November 2011 (UTC)Reply