Talk:South Luzon Force
Latest comment: 11 months ago by Sennecaster in topic Requested move 2 July 2023
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | On 2 July 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from South Luzon Force (SLF) to South Luzon Force. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 2 July 2023
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Sennecaster (Chat) 23:53, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
South Luzon Force (SLF) → South Luzon Force – Avoid WP:Name (acronym) * Pppery * it has begun... 12:54, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- Uncontroversial? I have reverted a cut'n'paste move to this effect, but have no objection to the name change itself. Lithopsian (talk) 13:47, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- Support. Buckshot06 (talk) 23:38, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Completely uncontroversial. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:01, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.