This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The article does not mention that a floppy formated at 1.44 MB by the superdisk could not be read by the standard drives! This fact would also contribuit to the non-acceptance of the new drives. I don't know if the sony drives suffered from this problem.
I'm almost certain this is not true. Do you have a source for this claim? Maury 17:12, 20 February 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
“
The fact that ultimately Superdisk (even as LS-240, which could read and write 240MB and 120MB media, supported 1,44MB HD floppies and could format them up to 30MB) did not survive either is seen as the greatest proof of this theory.
”
Whose theory is this? If this is a conclusion drawn by an editor, and it cannot be sourced, then it should be removed. — OranL (talk) 16:39, 5 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}