| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sonicflood article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
This page is incredibly biased and sites no information whatsoever. edit
I'm sure you magic people know how to deal with this.--99.140.58.148 (talk) 07:13, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Agreed. This reads like it was copied directly from a record labels marketing press release.--Davim00 (talk) 18:46, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Requested move edit
The page exists in both places. SONICFLOOd appears to be the correct way to write it, but this page has more work done on it. A move has been requested. -Goldom ‽‽‽ ⁂ 04:41, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
- This a s merge, that everybody who is interested can do. After merging, just make it a redirect. -- Kim van der Linde at venus 02:59, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
- To clarify, we're merging Sonicflood into SONICFLOOd (leaving Sonicflood as a redirect), correct?--Ktdreyer 17:22, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- Er, sorry for the confusion :) It seems like everything's done, so I'll add the redirect to SONICFLOOd.--Ktdreyer 17:33, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
Restoring history section edit
It seems the entire "History" section of this article was completely replaced at some point within the past year. Another website has appeared to have directly pulled the text from the previous Wikipedia entry in 2008 [1]. I am proposing this text be restored, along with the links intact. The reason for this request is the text that was replaced uses better language and is written in a way that adheres more properly to Wikipedia's guidelines. The current text, as has been pointed out, does not cite references and is completely biased, almost reading like a press release from a record label. Please verify the restoration of the old text to make this article adhere to Wikipedia's standards.--Davim00 (talk) 22:05, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, so there's more to this than I thought. I came through the project a few days ago and blew away several blatant (c) violations, including this one. I just moved it back to my last revision, since I knew that it at least didn't have issues as large... but if there's a more optimal history available, go ahead and restore it. I'm standing by with 3-4 sources already for proper expansion. Just lemme know. Dan, the CowMan (talk) 08:50, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
After the mountain of recent expansion, feedback would be appreciated at this point. Dan, the CowMan (talk) 01:10, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
new albums edit
we need articles for the two new albums i have cover art so.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Glman99 (talk • contribs) 20:36, 26 July 2010 (UTC)