Talk:Social impact of thong underwear
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
This article is terrible edit
it is sexist and not at all worthy of an encyclopedia. please delete. 173.77.64.64 (talk) 04:08, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Yahoo! Answers? edit
What is Yahoo! Answers doing as a couple of sources on this page? I thought it was not reliable... ★Dasani★ 21:18, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
- It isn't a reliable source. I'd remove them myself, but then I'd also have to find some reliable sources to replace those, since the text they're being referenced to cannot stand alone without sources. --Crackthewhip775 (talk) 23:08, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Just Praise edit
The Wikipedia Community is forever in debt to the creator of such a page. An article such as this shows the breadth and scope of this project. If no one objects, I would like to add this to the list of Wikipedia:unusual articles, cheers Dough007 (talk) 04:28, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- I couldn't disagree more. This has to be one of the worst articles in the entire project. It's beyond laughable that anyone could consider such an article in any way encyclopedic. The Dissident Aggressor 20:19, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Social impact of thong underwear. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070928015759/http://www.montereycountyweekly.com/articles/7128/print to http://www.montereycountyweekly.com/articles/7128/print
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071214172315/http://www.nbcsandiego.com:80/News/1429777/detail.html to http://www.nbcsandiego.com/News/1429777/detail.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120122041435/http://www.breakthechain.org:80/exclusives/aandf.html to http://www.breakthechain.org/exclusives/aandf.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:57, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Social impact of thong underwear. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071011160853/http://www.nbcsandiego.com:80/News/1427309/detail.html to http://www.nbcsandiego.com/News/1427309/detail.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071114063620/http://www.jsonline.com:80/story/index.aspx?id=43941 to http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=43941
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080519003450/http://www.nydailynews.com:80/archives/news/2005/02/06/2005-02-06_out_of_control_at_camp_crazy.html to http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/news/2005/02/06/2005-02-06_out_of_control_at_camp_crazy.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071011172530/http://indissent.com:80/jan2003/lawnews.htm to http://www.indissent.com/jan2003/lawnews.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:56, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Social impact of thong underwear. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080727005219/http://www.ambroseacademy.org/dresscode.pdf to http://www.ambroseacademy.org/dresscode.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071011210154/http://dhs.dixonusd.org:80/PAGES/Information/rules_dress.htm to http://dhs.dixonusd.org/PAGES/Information/rules_dress.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111120184346/http://www.10news.com/news/1515763/detail.html to http://www.10news.com/news/1515763/detail.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120208005132/http://ucce.ucdavis.edu/files/filelibrary/2557/28364.doc to http://ucce.ucdavis.edu/files/filelibrary/2557/28364.doc
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090907090215/http://www.sanmarcosrecord.com:80/local/local_story_220113341.html to http://www.sanmarcosrecord.com/local/local_story_220113341.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080518091250/http://www.local12.com:80/news/local/story.aspx?content_id=310a577e-96c7-48fe-ba8c-6e3d857308c6 to http://www.local12.com/news/local/story.aspx?content_id=310a577e-96c7-48fe-ba8c-6e3d857308c6
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:31, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Bias edit
Article opens with three back-to-back citations of Christian authors, explicitly labelling them as Christian. Why exactly should we care so much about what they think? Where are the psychologists, sociologists, or sexologists? No feminist academics? No historians? No fashion analysts? You made an article about the social impacts of some clothing without citing anyone who actually studies society, only those shaking their fists at it for not conforming to their worldview? I don't think it would take much inference to see bias going on here.
Moreover, the construction of the article is just a series of factoids about thongs rather than anything resembling an examination of social impact. It's like the author of this article really wanted to talk about thongs but lacked the intellectual adroitness to have anything interesting to say on the topic.
Pathetic. This article should be trashed.