Talk:Sobhita Dhulipala

Latest comment: 5 months ago by CNMall41 in topic Date of birth

No reference for birthplace

edit

It was mentioned in the article that the actress was born in Tenali but the references linked do not support the statement at all. SuswethaK (talk) 07:24, 21 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Date of birth

edit

thehindu says aged 27 as of 16 January, 2020, which renders as: 1992 or 1993 (age 31–32)
hindustantimes says aged 28 as of 17 October, 2020, which renders as: 1991 or 1992 (age 31–32)
So the only thing both refs agree on is a birth year of 1992. Neither state a specific date, or month, or day of birth. Geniac (talk) 02:45, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Continuing since this was removed and restored....hopefully we can get consensus per ONUS to retain something (at least the year of birth). It appears we can only deduce a year of birth using original research and neither talks about a specific month of day. With that, I am uneasy about adding a year (although I won't object), but we do not have either of these confirming a day or month. --CNMall41 (talk) 09:59, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
I've added an RS that mentions the full DOB, but since it is recent, I've kept the older two. One for background was restored because of this policy - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:07, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. Then there is no reason to have the other two sources if the one shows us the DOB. Just my opinion but feel free to leave them all as I won't object. For caste, maybe I am reading the discussion wrong, but it would actually support the removal of the parent's names which is consistent with WP:BLPNAME.--CNMall41 (talk) 10:41, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
BLPNAME says: "This is generally interpreted by the community to include the removal of names of non-notable minors from articles about their notable family members, such as when a notable individual births or sires a non-notable minor." Her parents are not minors. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:50, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
I agree with that interpretation for the portion the footnote represents. However, I am pointing specifically to "Consider whether the inclusion of names of living private individuals who are not directly involved in an article's topic adds significant value." I don't see any value in adding the names. --CNMall41 (talk) 07:04, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
They are her parents, and it's very common to list the name of parents, and are done so in every FA-quality article, from Christopher Nolan to Taylor Swift. If it were her non-notable children or other relatives being named, I'd object to that, but not her parents. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:16, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Just looking at Taylor Swift, her parents are in MANY reliable sources, including a feature in People Magazine, talking about their influence on her. The removal I made was based on a single source of the subject stating her parent's names. However, I did a more in-depth search online and see that this is not the only reference. Dhulipala's parents are in fact discussed in quite a few reliable sources so do not see it as an issue at this point.--CNMall41 (talk) 04:28, 10 January 2024 (UTC)Reply